Gambling versus investment: Lay theory and loss aversion

  • Xuesong Shang
  • , Hebing Duan
  • , Jingyi Lu*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Gambling and investment are two domains that involve financial decisions. The present research investigates people's lay theories about gambling and investment, and how these lay theories affect loss aversion in these domains. Lay people's understanding of gambling and investment is often largely based on information that is immediately available to them. Moreover, information about losing money by gambling and earning money through investments are more predominant than information about earning money by gambling and losing money through investments. Hence, we hypothesized and found that people tend to hold lay theories that gambling is more likely to cause losses and less likely to bring gains compared to investment (Study 1); and we observed a stronger loss aversion when the same monetary decision was framed as gambling rather than as an investment (Studies 2 to 6). This domain-framing effect held in both hypothetical and incentivized settings.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102367
JournalJournal of Economic Psychology
Volume84
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2021

Keywords

  • 3040
  • 3920
  • Domain specificity
  • Gambling
  • Investment
  • Lay theory
  • Loss aversion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gambling versus investment: Lay theory and loss aversion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this