TY - JOUR
T1 - Experimental effects and individual differences in linear mixed models
T2 - Estimating the relationship between spatial, object, and attraction effects in visual attention
AU - Kliegl, Reinhold
AU - Wei, Ping
AU - Dambacher, Michael
AU - Yan, Ming
AU - Zhou, Xiaolin
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Linear mixed models (LMMs) provide a still underused methodological perspective on combining experimental and individual-differences research. Here we illustrate this approach with two-rectangle cueing in visual attention (Egly et al., 1994). We replicated previous experimental cue-validity effects relating to a spatial shift of attention within an object (spatial effect), to attention switch between objects (object effect), and to the attraction of attention toward the display centroid (attraction effect), also taking into account the design-inherent imbalance of valid and other trials. We simultaneously estimated variance/covariance components of subject-related random effects for these spatial, object, and attraction effects in addition to their mean reaction times (RTs). The spatial effect showed a strong positive correlation with mean RT and a strong negative correlation with the attraction effect. The analysis of individual differences suggests that slow subjects engage attention more strongly at the cued location than fast subjects. We compare this joint LMM analysis of experimental effects and associated subject-related variances and correlations with two frequently used alternative statistical procedures.
AB - Linear mixed models (LMMs) provide a still underused methodological perspective on combining experimental and individual-differences research. Here we illustrate this approach with two-rectangle cueing in visual attention (Egly et al., 1994). We replicated previous experimental cue-validity effects relating to a spatial shift of attention within an object (spatial effect), to attention switch between objects (object effect), and to the attraction of attention toward the display centroid (attraction effect), also taking into account the design-inherent imbalance of valid and other trials. We simultaneously estimated variance/covariance components of subject-related random effects for these spatial, object, and attraction effects in addition to their mean reaction times (RTs). The spatial effect showed a strong positive correlation with mean RT and a strong negative correlation with the attraction effect. The analysis of individual differences suggests that slow subjects engage attention more strongly at the cued location than fast subjects. We compare this joint LMM analysis of experimental effects and associated subject-related variances and correlations with two frequently used alternative statistical procedures.
KW - Individual differences
KW - Linear mixed model
KW - Object-based attention
KW - Spatial attention
KW - Visual attention
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84865801553
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00238
DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00238
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:84865801553
SN - 1664-1078
VL - 1
JO - Frontiers in Psychology
JF - Frontiers in Psychology
IS - JAN
M1 - Article 238
ER -