Evaluation of Scientific and Technological Research in China’s Colleges: A Review of Policy Reforms, 2000–2020

Junwen Zhu*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: This study conducts a systematic review of policy reforms for the evaluation of scientific and technological research (E-STR) in China’s colleges. In doing so, it identifies changes to past policies, as well as the objectives and realizability of the most recent policy reform. Design/Approach/Methods: This study systematically reviews the contexts of E-STR policy reforms in China’s colleges post 2000 using three important related policy documents from 2003, 2013, and 2020 as samples. Research findings were obtained via content analysis. Findings: Unlike previous attempts, the most recent policy reform has incorporated the lessons learned while introducing highly targeted measures and a monitoring mechanism. Such reform should accelerate the promotion of major original scientific research in China’s colleges, enhance the contribution of scientific research to socioeconomic development, and strengthen support for the cultivation of undergraduate talents. Originality/Value: Initiated in the early part of 2000, China’s latest E-STR policy reform constitutes an important turning point in the initiative to burst the research bubble and return to the essence of innovation. It will drive China’s colleges to embark on a research path that places value on original innovation and contribution to socioeconomic development.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)556-561
Number of pages6
JournalECNU Review of Education
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2020

Keywords

  • China
  • Science Citation Index
  • higher education
  • policy reform
  • research evaluation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of Scientific and Technological Research in China’s Colleges: A Review of Policy Reforms, 2000–2020'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this