TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimation and uncertainty analyses of grassland biomass in Northern China
T2 - Comparison of multiple remote sensing data sources and modeling approaches
AU - Jia, Wenxiao
AU - Liu, Min
AU - Yang, Yuanhe
AU - He, Honglin
AU - Zhu, Xudong
AU - Yang, Fang
AU - Yin, Cai
AU - Xiang, Weining
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/1/1
Y1 - 2016/1/1
N2 - Accurate estimation of grassland biomass and its dynamics are crucial not only for the biogeochemical dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems, but also for the sustainable use of grassland resources. However, estimations of grassland biomass on large spatial scale usually suffer from large variability and mostly lack quantitative uncertainty analyses. In this study, the spatial grassland biomass estimation and its uncertainty were assessed based on 265 field measurements and remote sensing data across Northern China during 2001-2005. Potential sources of uncertainty, including remote sensing data sources (DATsrc), model forms (MODfrm) and model parameters (biomass allocation, BMallo, e.g. root:shoot ratio), were determined and their relative contribution was quantified. The results showed that the annual grassland biomass in Northern China was 1268.37 ± 180.84 Tg (i.e., 532.02 ± 99.71 g/m2) during 2001-2005, increasing from western to eastern area, with a mean relative uncertainty of 19.8%. There were distinguishable differences among the uncertainty contributions of three sources (BMallo > DATsrc > MODfrm), which contributed 52%, 27% and 13%, respectively. This study highlighted the need to concern the uncertainty in grassland biomass estimation, especially for the uncertainty related to BMallo.
AB - Accurate estimation of grassland biomass and its dynamics are crucial not only for the biogeochemical dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems, but also for the sustainable use of grassland resources. However, estimations of grassland biomass on large spatial scale usually suffer from large variability and mostly lack quantitative uncertainty analyses. In this study, the spatial grassland biomass estimation and its uncertainty were assessed based on 265 field measurements and remote sensing data across Northern China during 2001-2005. Potential sources of uncertainty, including remote sensing data sources (DATsrc), model forms (MODfrm) and model parameters (biomass allocation, BMallo, e.g. root:shoot ratio), were determined and their relative contribution was quantified. The results showed that the annual grassland biomass in Northern China was 1268.37 ± 180.84 Tg (i.e., 532.02 ± 99.71 g/m2) during 2001-2005, increasing from western to eastern area, with a mean relative uncertainty of 19.8%. There were distinguishable differences among the uncertainty contributions of three sources (BMallo > DATsrc > MODfrm), which contributed 52%, 27% and 13%, respectively. This study highlighted the need to concern the uncertainty in grassland biomass estimation, especially for the uncertainty related to BMallo.
KW - Grassland biomass
KW - NDVI
KW - Northern China
KW - Root-to-shoot ratio
KW - Uncertainty analysis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84942475008
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.001
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.001
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:84942475008
SN - 1470-160X
VL - 60
SP - 1031
EP - 1040
JO - Ecological Indicators
JF - Ecological Indicators
ER -