Equity in science: advocating for a triple-blind review system

Stephanie Brodie; André Frainer; Maria Grazia Pennino; Shan Jiang; Laura Kaikkonen; Jon Lopez; Kelly Ortega-Cisneros; Carl A. Peters; Samiya A. Selim; Natașa Văidianu

doi:10.1016/j.tree.2021.07.011

Equity in science: advocating for a triple-blind review system

Stephanie Brodie^*
, André Frainer
, Maria Grazia Pennino
, Shan Jiang
, Laura Kaikkonen
, Jon Lopez
, Kelly Ortega-Cisneros
, Carl A. Peters
, Samiya A. Selim
, Natașa Văidianu

^*Corresponding author for this work

State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research (School of Marine Sciences)

Institute of Marine Sciences
University of California at Santa Cruz
Southwest Fisheries Science Centre
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
Oceanographic Centre of Vigo
Ecosystems and Environment Research Programme
University of Helsinki
Bycatch Mitigation and Gear Technology Group
Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission
Department of Biological Sciences
University of Cape Town
Ocean Frontier Institute
Center for Sustainable Development
University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh
Leibniz Center for Tropical Marine Research
Faculty of Natural Sciences and Agricultural Sciences
Ovidius University of Constanta
Interdisciplinary Center for Advanced Research on Territorial Dynamics
University of Bucharest

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

We propose 'triple-blind review' for peer-reviewed journals – a process that keeps author identities and affiliations blind to manuscript editors until after first appraisal. Blinded appraisal will help to reduce the biases that negatively affect under-represented and minority scientists, ultimately better supporting equity in scientific publishing.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	957-959
Number of pages	3
Journal	Trends in Ecology and Evolution
Volume	36
Issue number	11
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2021.07.011
State	Published - Nov 2021

Access to Document

10.1016/j.tree.2021.07.011

Cite this

@article{24dea8d76dab4aeab7905df563084f65,

title = "Equity in science: advocating for a triple-blind review system",

abstract = "We propose 'triple-blind review' for peer-reviewed journals {\textendash} a process that keeps author identities and affiliations blind to manuscript editors until after first appraisal. Blinded appraisal will help to reduce the biases that negatively affect under-represented and minority scientists, ultimately better supporting equity in scientific publishing.",

author = "Stephanie Brodie and Andr{\'e} Frainer and Pennino, \{Maria Grazia\} and Shan Jiang and Laura Kaikkonen and Jon Lopez and Kelly Ortega-Cisneros and Peters, \{Carl A.\} and Selim, \{Samiya A.\} and Natașa V{\u a}idianu",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Elsevier Ltd",

year = "2021",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1016/j.tree.2021.07.011",

language = "英语",

volume = "36",

pages = "957--959",

journal = "Trends in Ecology and Evolution",

issn = "0169-5347",

publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Equity in science

T2 - advocating for a triple-blind review system

AU - Brodie, Stephanie

AU - Frainer, André

AU - Pennino, Maria Grazia

AU - Jiang, Shan

AU - Kaikkonen, Laura

AU - Lopez, Jon

AU - Ortega-Cisneros, Kelly

AU - Peters, Carl A.

AU - Selim, Samiya A.

AU - Văidianu, Natașa

PY - 2021/11

Y1 - 2021/11

N2 - We propose 'triple-blind review' for peer-reviewed journals – a process that keeps author identities and affiliations blind to manuscript editors until after first appraisal. Blinded appraisal will help to reduce the biases that negatively affect under-represented and minority scientists, ultimately better supporting equity in scientific publishing.

AB - We propose 'triple-blind review' for peer-reviewed journals – a process that keeps author identities and affiliations blind to manuscript editors until after first appraisal. Blinded appraisal will help to reduce the biases that negatively affect under-represented and minority scientists, ultimately better supporting equity in scientific publishing.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85113725915

U2 - 10.1016/j.tree.2021.07.011

DO - 10.1016/j.tree.2021.07.011

M3 - 评论/辩论

C2 - 34456068

AN - SCOPUS:85113725915

SN - 0169-5347

VL - 36

SP - 957

EP - 959

JO - Trends in Ecology and Evolution

JF - Trends in Ecology and Evolution

IS - 11

ER -

Equity in science: advocating for a triple-blind review system

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this