Equity in science: advocating for a triple-blind review system

  • Stephanie Brodie*
  • , André Frainer
  • , Maria Grazia Pennino
  • , Shan Jiang
  • , Laura Kaikkonen
  • , Jon Lopez
  • , Kelly Ortega-Cisneros
  • , Carl A. Peters
  • , Samiya A. Selim
  • , Natașa Văidianu
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

We propose 'triple-blind review' for peer-reviewed journals – a process that keeps author identities and affiliations blind to manuscript editors until after first appraisal. Blinded appraisal will help to reduce the biases that negatively affect under-represented and minority scientists, ultimately better supporting equity in scientific publishing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)957-959
Number of pages3
JournalTrends in Ecology and Evolution
Volume36
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Equity in science: advocating for a triple-blind review system'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this