TY - JOUR
T1 - Environmental filtering and spatial processes shape the beta diversity of liana communities in a valley savanna in southwest China
AU - Zhang, Yun Bing
AU - Wu, Huai Dong
AU - Yang, Jie
AU - Song, Xiao Yang
AU - Yang, Da
AU - He, Fangliang
AU - Zhang, Jiao Lin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 International Association for Vegetation Science
PY - 2020/10
Y1 - 2020/10
N2 - Questions: Lianas contribute substantially to the diversity and function of ecosystems. What is the relative importance of environmental filtering and spatial processes on structuring liana beta diversity at taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic levels? Is there any synergy between these drivers (environmental factors and spatial distance) on shaping these three dimensions of beta diversity in a savanna liana community?. Location: A dry-hot valley savanna in Yunnan Province, southwest China. Methods: We established 30 20 m × 20 m plots in the savanna to collect data on the distribution of 22 liana species, 19 functional traits, and plot-level soil nutrients, elevation, and slope. The relative contributions of these environmental factors and spatial distance to liana taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic dissimilarity were analyzed using multiple regression on distance matrices. We also tested which environmental factors influence the beta diversity of liana community using permutational multivariate analysis of variance. Results: Both environmental and spatial distances were significantly correlated with taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic dissimilarity. Spatial distance explained more variation in taxonomic beta diversity than environmental factors. But for both nearest-neighbour functional and phylogenetic distance Dnn’, environment explained relatively more variation than space did. Moreover, the proportion explained by environmental variables was ranked in decreasing order as follows: functional Dnn’, phylogenetic Dnn’, and taxonomic beta diversity. We found soil pH had the highest contribution to taxonomic and functional beta diversity, while soil total nitrogen contributed most to phylogenetic beta diversity. Conclusions: This study revealed that liana taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic beta diversity in the studied hot-dry savanna ecosystem is affected and maintained by both environmental filtering and spatial processes. Moreover, the functional and phylogenetic diversities were more strongly subject to environmental filtering. Our study provides information on the mechanisms underlying liana diversity maintenance in savanna, which is necessary to inform conservation management in this vulnerable ecosystem.
AB - Questions: Lianas contribute substantially to the diversity and function of ecosystems. What is the relative importance of environmental filtering and spatial processes on structuring liana beta diversity at taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic levels? Is there any synergy between these drivers (environmental factors and spatial distance) on shaping these three dimensions of beta diversity in a savanna liana community?. Location: A dry-hot valley savanna in Yunnan Province, southwest China. Methods: We established 30 20 m × 20 m plots in the savanna to collect data on the distribution of 22 liana species, 19 functional traits, and plot-level soil nutrients, elevation, and slope. The relative contributions of these environmental factors and spatial distance to liana taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic dissimilarity were analyzed using multiple regression on distance matrices. We also tested which environmental factors influence the beta diversity of liana community using permutational multivariate analysis of variance. Results: Both environmental and spatial distances were significantly correlated with taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic dissimilarity. Spatial distance explained more variation in taxonomic beta diversity than environmental factors. But for both nearest-neighbour functional and phylogenetic distance Dnn’, environment explained relatively more variation than space did. Moreover, the proportion explained by environmental variables was ranked in decreasing order as follows: functional Dnn’, phylogenetic Dnn’, and taxonomic beta diversity. We found soil pH had the highest contribution to taxonomic and functional beta diversity, while soil total nitrogen contributed most to phylogenetic beta diversity. Conclusions: This study revealed that liana taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic beta diversity in the studied hot-dry savanna ecosystem is affected and maintained by both environmental filtering and spatial processes. Moreover, the functional and phylogenetic diversities were more strongly subject to environmental filtering. Our study provides information on the mechanisms underlying liana diversity maintenance in savanna, which is necessary to inform conservation management in this vulnerable ecosystem.
KW - community assembly
KW - deterministic processes
KW - functional beta diversity
KW - liana diversity
KW - phylogenetic beta diversity
KW - savanna ecosystem
KW - stochastic processes
KW - taxonomic turnover
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85090136925
U2 - 10.1111/avsc.12514
DO - 10.1111/avsc.12514
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85090136925
SN - 1402-2001
VL - 23
SP - 482
EP - 494
JO - Applied Vegetation Science
JF - Applied Vegetation Science
IS - 4
ER -