Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Electrophysiological evidence for encoding mechanisms underlying the formation of false recognitions with context retrieval

  • Hanyue Liu
  • , Xiuyan Guo
  • , Yujiao Li
  • , Xin Xin Pan
  • , Yang Lu
  • , Li Zheng*
  • , Qianyun Gao*
  • , Feifei Lu
  • , Lin Li
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Xihua University
  • Fudan University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The source-strength effect paradigm—in which strong and weak semantic associates of a critical lure are studied with distinct contexts—reveals that false memories vary in vividness. This is demonstrated by both attribution rate and context memory strength ratings. Specifically, when critical lures are falsely recognized, they are more frequently attributed to the contexts of their strong associates than to other contexts linked to weak associates or to other lists' associates. Previous research further shows that context memory strength ratings for lure attributions to strong associates' contexts are higher than those for lure attributions to other contexts, indicating that the former were experienced more vividly. A recent event-related potentials (ERPs) study (Liu et al., 2025) has shown that distinct retrieval processes — recollection and reconstruction — underlie these different memorial outcomes. However, their encoding neurocognitive origins remain unknown. To address this gap, the current study reanalyzed data from our prior ERPs investigation (Liu et al., 2025) by applying the subsequent memory paradigm to dissociate the encoding subprocesses that produce various memorial responses to critical lures. Results revealed a pronounced early parietal subsequent memory effect (SME), which may be related to schema-based integration, for strong associates whose corresponding lures were later attributed to strong associates' contexts—the outcome associated with higher subjective vividness. Conversely, a strong late frontal SME indexing elaborative associative processing emerged for weak associates whose lures were later attributed to other contexts—the outcome associated with lower vividness. Associates linked to correctly rejected lures elicited neither SME. These findings demonstrate that schema-based integration and elaborative associative processing forge the distinct traces that later support false memories with different levels of contextual vividness.

Original languageEnglish
Article number113353
JournalInternational Journal of Psychophysiology
Volume223
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2026

Keywords

  • Context memory
  • Encoding
  • Event-related potentials
  • False memory
  • Source memory
  • Subsequent memory effect

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Electrophysiological evidence for encoding mechanisms underlying the formation of false recognitions with context retrieval'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this