TY - JOUR
T1 - Effective universal school-based social and emotional learning programs for improving academic achievement
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis of 50 years of research
AU - Corcoran, Roisin P.
AU - Cheung, Alan C.K.
AU - Kim, Elizabeth
AU - Xie, Chen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017
PY - 2018/11
Y1 - 2018/11
N2 - This review explored the research regarding the effects of pre-K-12 school-based social and emotional learning (SEL) interventions on reading (N = 57,755), mathematics (N = 61,360), and science (N = 16,380) achievement. The review focused on research that met the criteria for high methodological standards. Further, methodological and substantive characteristics of these studies were examined to investigate the association between SEL and study characteristics. There were 40 studies that qualified that were included in the final analysis based on pre-K-12 participants. The results of this review found that SEL had a positive effect on reading (ES = +0.25), mathematics (ES = +0.26), and (though small) science (ES = +0.19) compared to traditional methods, consistent with previous reviews. However, SEL programs from more rigorous randomized studies with large sample sizes that have dominated the classroom over the last few decades might not have as meaningful effects for pre-K-12 students as once thought. More randomized studies are needed to confirm these conclusions.
AB - This review explored the research regarding the effects of pre-K-12 school-based social and emotional learning (SEL) interventions on reading (N = 57,755), mathematics (N = 61,360), and science (N = 16,380) achievement. The review focused on research that met the criteria for high methodological standards. Further, methodological and substantive characteristics of these studies were examined to investigate the association between SEL and study characteristics. There were 40 studies that qualified that were included in the final analysis based on pre-K-12 participants. The results of this review found that SEL had a positive effect on reading (ES = +0.25), mathematics (ES = +0.26), and (though small) science (ES = +0.19) compared to traditional methods, consistent with previous reviews. However, SEL programs from more rigorous randomized studies with large sample sizes that have dominated the classroom over the last few decades might not have as meaningful effects for pre-K-12 students as once thought. More randomized studies are needed to confirm these conclusions.
KW - Academic achievement
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Social and emotional learning programs
KW - Systematic review
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85054065707
U2 - 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.12.001
DO - 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.12.001
M3 - 文献综述
AN - SCOPUS:85054065707
SN - 1747-938X
VL - 25
SP - 56
EP - 72
JO - Educational Research Review
JF - Educational Research Review
ER -