Effect of scarcity experience on unethical behavior: The mediating role of consideration of future consequences

  • Ying Yang
  • , Lin Liu
  • , Kaiyue Mou
  • , Shuhong Kong
  • , Yan Wang*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Scarcity experience occurs when people feel they have less than they need. Previous research indicates that scarcity experience affects individuals’ cognitive function, social behavior, and decision-making process. However, it remains unclear whether and how experienced scarcity influences unethical behavior. This paper reports three studies testing the potential relationship and mediational mechanisms. Study 1 assesses the associations between general scarcity experience, desire for money, consideration of future consequences, and unethical behavior. Studies 2 and 3 then manipulate scarcity experience (versus abundant experience and a neutral control condition) through paradigms of recalling (Study 2) and imagining (Study 3), and test the effect on self-reported unethical behavior (Study 2) and actual unethical conduct (Study 3), as well as the mediating effects of desire for money and consideration of future consequences. The results show that individuals experiencing scarcity were more likely to behave unethically, regardless of gender, age, or socioeconomic status. However, consideration of future consequences mediated the effect of scarcity experience on unethical behavior only in Study 1. Further research is needed to uncover the underlying mechanism through which scarcity evokes unethical behavior.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31495-31504
Number of pages10
JournalCurrent Psychology
Volume42
Issue number35
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2023

Keywords

  • Consideration of future consequences
  • Desire for money
  • Scarcity experience
  • Unethical behavior

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of scarcity experience on unethical behavior: The mediating role of consideration of future consequences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this