Do migrants and locals differ in commuting behavior? A case study of Xiamen, China

  • Yongling Li
  • , Stan Geertman
  • , Pieter Hooimeijer
  • , Yanliu Lin
  • , Haoran Yang*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although there is a growing body of literature on the commuting pattern of rural migrants in China, few studies have examined the diversity in commuting behavior among workers with different occupations. The present research used the 2015 Xiamen household travel survey to examine commuting distances and commuting times of distinctive types of workers in the city. The results reveal differences in commuting behaviors among distinctive socioeconomic groups, namely blue-collar, pink-collar, or white-collar local or migrant workers. For local residents, blue-collar workers have the longest commute distance, while pink-collar workers have the shortest commute distance. Migrant workers—for both blue-collar and pink-collar—in general commute over shorter distances than local workers to reach their workplaces. However, planning practices have attempted to demolish their affordable rental housing in urban villages, which will increase their commuting times and costs and exacerbate sociospatial inequality. These findings can be of practical use when offering alternative housing for migrants in urban redevelopment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalTransport Policy
Volume108
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. Sustainable cities and communities
    Sustainable cities and communities

Keywords

  • China
  • Commuting behaviors
  • Different socioeconomic groups
  • Migrants
  • Spatial mismatch

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do migrants and locals differ in commuting behavior? A case study of Xiamen, China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this