Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Disagreement on foundational principles of biological aging

  • Vadim N. Gladyshev*
  • , Benjamin Anderson
  • , Hanna Barlit
  • , Benjamin Barré
  • , Samuel Beck
  • , Bahareh Behrouz
  • , Daniel W. Belsky
  • , Amandine Chaix
  • , Manish Chamoli
  • , Brian H. Chen
  • , Kaiyang Cheng
  • , Jane Chuprin
  • , Gary A. Churchill
  • , Andrea Cipriano
  • , Alex Colville
  • , Joris Deelen
  • , Yuri Deigin
  • , Ke Huan K. Edmonds
  • , Bradley W. English
  • , Ruogu Fang
  • Michael Florea, Iosif M. Gershteyn, Diljeet Gill, Laura H. Goetz, Vera Gorbunova, Patrick T. Griffin, Steve Horvath, Martin Borch Jensen, Xin Jin, Sara Jovanovska, Kathrin M. Kajderowicz, Tomoko Kasahara, Csaba Kerepesi, Subhash Kulkarni, Vyacheslav M. Labunskyy, Morgan E. Levine, Sergiy Libert, J. Yuyang Lu, Yuancheng Ryan Lu, Riccardo E. Marioni, Brianah M. McCoy, Wayne Mitchell, Mahdi Moqri, Farzaneh Nasirian, Peter Niimi, Hamilton Se Hwee Oh, Brian Okundaye, Andrey A. Parkhitko, Leonid Peshkin, Mia Petljak, Jesse R. Poganik, Glen Pridham, Daniel E.L. Promislow, Weronika Prusisz, Margaux Quiniou, Ken Raj, Daniel Richard, Jose Luis Ricon, Jarod Rutledge, Morten Scheibye-Knudsen, Nicholas J. Schork, Andrei Seluanov, Michael Shadpour, Anastasia V. Shindyapina, Steven R. Shuken, Sruthi Sivakumar, Thomas Stoeger, Ayumu Sugiura, Nadia R. Sutton, Alexander Suvorov, Andrei E. Tarkhov, Emma C. Teeling, Alexandre Trapp, Alexander Tyshkovskiy, Maximilian Unfried, Cavin K. Ward-Caviness, Sun Hee Yim, Kejun Ying, Jeffrey Yunes, Bohan Zhang, Alex Zhavoronkov
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Harvard University
  • Broad Institute
  • Articulate Ventures
  • Boston University
  • Vincere Biosciences Inc.
  • Columbia University
  • University of Utah
  • Buck Institute for Age Research
  • California Pacific Medical Center
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • Jackson Laboratory
  • Stanford University
  • Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing
  • University of Cologne
  • YouthBio Therapeutics Inc.
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • University of Florida
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • Altos Labs Cambridge Institute of Science
  • Inc.
  • University of Rochester
  • Altos Labs
  • Gordian Biotechnology
  • Scripps Research Institute
  • Utrecht University
  • Whitehead Inst. for Biomed. Research
  • Tohoku University
  • Institute for Computer Science and Control
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Alphabet Inc.
  • University of Edinburgh
  • Arizona State University
  • Northeastern University
  • Texas Tech University
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • New York University
  • Dalhousie University
  • Tufts University
  • Tecra Space
  • University of Zurich
  • Retro Biosciences
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Translational Genomics Research Institute
  • Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering
  • Northwestern University
  • Simpson Querrey Institute for BioNanotechnology
  • Juntendo University
  • Vanderbilt University
  • University of Massachusetts
  • University College Dublin
  • National University of Singapore
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency
  • Yunes Foundation for Research on Aging
  • Insilico Medicine US Inc

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

To gain insight into how researchers of aging perceive the process they study, we conducted a survey among experts in the field. While highlighting some common features of aging, the survey exposed broad disagreement on the foundational issues. What is aging? What causes it? When does it begin? What constitutes rejuvenation? Not only was there no consensus on these and other core questions, but none of the questions received a majority opinion—even regarding the need for consensus itself. Despite many researchers believing they understand aging, their understanding diverges considerably. Importantly, as different processes are labeled as “aging” by researchers, different experimental approaches are prioritized. The survey shed light on the need to better define which aging processes this field should target and what its goals are. It also allowed us to categorize contemporary views on aging and rejuvenation, revealing critical, yet largely unanswered, questions that appear disconnected from the current research focus. Finally, we discuss ways to address the disagreement, which we hope will ultimately aid progress in the field.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberpgae499
JournalPNAS Nexus
Volume3
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2024
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disagreement on foundational principles of biological aging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this