TY - JOUR
T1 - Degradation of a Main Plastic Pollutant Polyethylene Terephthalate by Two Distinct Proteases (Neprilysin and Cutinase-like Enzyme)
AU - Hu, Qiaoyu
AU - Jayasinghe-Arachchige, Vindi M.
AU - Prabhakar, Rajeev
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2021/2/22
Y1 - 2021/2/22
N2 - In this DFT study, hydrolysis of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), a major cause of plastic pollution, by two distinct enzymes, neprilysin (NEP, a mononuclear metalloprotease) and cutinase-like enzyme (CLE, a serine protease), has been investigated. These enzymes utilize different mechanisms for the degradation of PET. NEP uses either the metal-bound hydroxide attack (MH) mechanism or reverse protonation (RP) mechanism, while CLE utilizes a general acid/base mechanism that includes acylation and deacylation processes. Additionally, the RP mechanism of NEP can proceed through three pathways, RP0, RP1, and RP2. The DFT calculations predict that, among all these mechanisms, the MH mechanism is the energetically most favorable one for the NEP enzyme. In comparison, CLE catalyzes this reaction with a significantly higher barrier. These results suggest that the Lewis acid and nucleophile activations provided by the Zn metal center of NEP are more effective than the hydrogen bonding interactions afforded by the catalytic Ser85-His180-Asp165 triad of CLE. They have provided intrinsic details regarding PET degradation and will pave the way for the design of efficient metal-based catalysts for this critical reaction.
AB - In this DFT study, hydrolysis of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), a major cause of plastic pollution, by two distinct enzymes, neprilysin (NEP, a mononuclear metalloprotease) and cutinase-like enzyme (CLE, a serine protease), has been investigated. These enzymes utilize different mechanisms for the degradation of PET. NEP uses either the metal-bound hydroxide attack (MH) mechanism or reverse protonation (RP) mechanism, while CLE utilizes a general acid/base mechanism that includes acylation and deacylation processes. Additionally, the RP mechanism of NEP can proceed through three pathways, RP0, RP1, and RP2. The DFT calculations predict that, among all these mechanisms, the MH mechanism is the energetically most favorable one for the NEP enzyme. In comparison, CLE catalyzes this reaction with a significantly higher barrier. These results suggest that the Lewis acid and nucleophile activations provided by the Zn metal center of NEP are more effective than the hydrogen bonding interactions afforded by the catalytic Ser85-His180-Asp165 triad of CLE. They have provided intrinsic details regarding PET degradation and will pave the way for the design of efficient metal-based catalysts for this critical reaction.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85101904748
U2 - 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00797
DO - 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00797
M3 - 文章
C2 - 33534993
AN - SCOPUS:85101904748
SN - 1549-9596
VL - 61
SP - 764
EP - 776
JO - Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
JF - Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
IS - 2
ER -