Abstract
Nearly all philosophical inquiry is rooted in contingency. From ontology and theories of God to politics and ethics, dealing with, explaining, planning for, or even following contingency is a consistent theme. In the background of their recent works, Michael Sandel, Hartmut Rosa, John Gray, and Richard Rorty all see contingency and autonomy in a see-saw relationship: more of one correspondingly results in less of the other. Daoist philosophical reflections provide a different take on contingency. We can still have an experience of “self” and of making choices without positing any notion of autonomy outside of contingency.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 972 |
| Journal | Religions |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2022 |
Keywords
- Daoism
- Hartmut Rosa
- John Gray
- Laozi
- Michael Sandel
- Richard Rorty
- Zhuangzi
- autonomy
- contingency