Abstract
The authors regret that scoring of one scale to assess childhood environmental unpredictability was described incorrectly in the original article. The original article states that anchoring from 0 to 3 was used (p. 216, right column, second last paragraph) for the administration of the Chinese version of the Environmental Conditions Scale. The correct numeric range of anchors used in the current study is 1–4. Only the numerical anchoring was incorrectly described, the lexical anchors were correctly defined at each level. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 133 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Personality and Individual Differences |
| Volume | 132 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - 1 Oct 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |