TY - JOUR
T1 - Corrigendum to
T2 - Formation Mechanism of the First Carbon-Carbon Bond and the First Olefin in the Methanol Conversion into Hydrocarbons (Angewandte Chemie International Edition, (2016), 55, 19, (5723-5726), 10.1002/anie.201511678)
AU - Liu, Yue
AU - Müller, Sebastian
AU - Berger, Daniel
AU - Jelic, Jelena
AU - Reuter, Karsten
AU - Tonigold, Markus
AU - Sanchez-Sanchez, Maricruz
AU - Lercher, Johannes A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
PY - 2017/6/19
Y1 - 2017/6/19
N2 - In this Communication, an erroneous use of a literature reported reaction rate as a rate constant was made in the rate calculation in Supporting Information S9: “A semi-quantitative estimation of the carbonylation rate is made based on reported kinetic data from literature. A rate constant of 6.8 mol (g atom Al)−1 h−1 was applied for the reaction on HZSM-5 at 450 °C, according to literature (Fig. 1 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1617-1620). Applying a reaction order of 1 for CO and 0 for dimethyl ether, and an H-ZSM-5(Si/Al 90) loading of 1 g, acetyl species (HOAc and MeOAc) formation rate of 560 μmol/min under 1 mbar CO or 5.6 μmol/min under 0.01 mbar CO was obtained.” A new estimation of the carbonylation rate was made by the authors based on their experimental data. Thus, the statement must be corrected to “A semi-quantitative estimation of the carbonylation rate is made based on our experimental results over H-ZSM-5(Si/Al 90). A carbon-based reaction rate constant of 140 mmol (g cat)−1 h−1 (bar CO)−1 at 450 °C was obtained from our DME carbonylation experiment. Applying a reaction order of 1 for CO and 0 for dimethyl ether, and an H-ZSM-5 loading of 1 g, acetyl species (HOAc and MeOAc) formation rate is calculated to be 140 μmol h−1 (2.3 μmol min−1) under 1 mbar CO.” At 450 °C, this catalyst showed an initial period of ca. 1.5 h (g cat)−1 (mol MeOH)−1 before the detection of olefins, and ca. 0.4 % yield of methane from which CO is estimated to be ca. 0.7 mbar. This leads to a yield of 150 ppm of acetyl species during this initial period, which was demonstrated, in the DME carbonylation experiment, to be sufficient to trigger olefin formation at even 300 °C. Thus, the corrected calculation does not change the conclusion on the slow rate for the carbonylation process and the sufficiency of the accumulated acetyl products to trigger the formation of hydrocarbon pool. The authors acknowledge the helpful comments from Prof. Aditya Bhan, University of Minnesota.
AB - In this Communication, an erroneous use of a literature reported reaction rate as a rate constant was made in the rate calculation in Supporting Information S9: “A semi-quantitative estimation of the carbonylation rate is made based on reported kinetic data from literature. A rate constant of 6.8 mol (g atom Al)−1 h−1 was applied for the reaction on HZSM-5 at 450 °C, according to literature (Fig. 1 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1617-1620). Applying a reaction order of 1 for CO and 0 for dimethyl ether, and an H-ZSM-5(Si/Al 90) loading of 1 g, acetyl species (HOAc and MeOAc) formation rate of 560 μmol/min under 1 mbar CO or 5.6 μmol/min under 0.01 mbar CO was obtained.” A new estimation of the carbonylation rate was made by the authors based on their experimental data. Thus, the statement must be corrected to “A semi-quantitative estimation of the carbonylation rate is made based on our experimental results over H-ZSM-5(Si/Al 90). A carbon-based reaction rate constant of 140 mmol (g cat)−1 h−1 (bar CO)−1 at 450 °C was obtained from our DME carbonylation experiment. Applying a reaction order of 1 for CO and 0 for dimethyl ether, and an H-ZSM-5 loading of 1 g, acetyl species (HOAc and MeOAc) formation rate is calculated to be 140 μmol h−1 (2.3 μmol min−1) under 1 mbar CO.” At 450 °C, this catalyst showed an initial period of ca. 1.5 h (g cat)−1 (mol MeOH)−1 before the detection of olefins, and ca. 0.4 % yield of methane from which CO is estimated to be ca. 0.7 mbar. This leads to a yield of 150 ppm of acetyl species during this initial period, which was demonstrated, in the DME carbonylation experiment, to be sufficient to trigger olefin formation at even 300 °C. Thus, the corrected calculation does not change the conclusion on the slow rate for the carbonylation process and the sufficiency of the accumulated acetyl products to trigger the formation of hydrocarbon pool. The authors acknowledge the helpful comments from Prof. Aditya Bhan, University of Minnesota.
KW - C−C coupling
KW - carbonylation
KW - methanol-to-hydrocarbons
KW - olefin
KW - zeolites
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85020423032
U2 - 10.1002/anie.201704600
DO - 10.1002/anie.201704600
M3 - 评论/辩论
C2 - 28597523
AN - SCOPUS:85020423032
SN - 1433-7851
VL - 56
SP - 7342
JO - Angewandte Chemie - International Edition
JF - Angewandte Chemie - International Edition
IS - 26
ER -