TY - JOUR
T1 - Correction
T2 - Fluorinated Compounds in North American Cosmetics (Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. (2021) 8: 7 (538−544) DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00240)
AU - Whitehead, Heather D.
AU - Venier, Marta
AU - Wu, Yan
AU - Eastman, Emi
AU - Urbanik, Shannon
AU - Diamond, Miriam L.
AU - Shalin, Anna
AU - Schwartz-Narbonne, Heather
AU - Bruton, Thomas A.
AU - Blum, Arlene
AU - Wang, Zhanyun
AU - Green, Megan
AU - Tighe, Meghanne
AU - Wilkinson, John T.
AU - McGuinness, Sean
AU - Peaslee, Graham F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Chemical Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/12/14
Y1 - 2021/12/14
N2 - Due to a calibration problem with the targeted analysis affecting only the Canadian products (n = 17), in our original article (https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett. 1c00240), data for Canadian products were requantified using the isotopically labeled surrogate standards. Each target compound was assigned to a specific surrogate standard as described in Table S7 of the Supporting Information. As a result of the requantification of the Canadian samples, the sum of PFAS concentrations for Canadian samples has decreased, and the detection frequency of individual analytes shifted. Out of the 231 total U.S. and Canadian samples analyzed with PIGE, 29 were selected for further targeted analysis. Of those 29, 17 (only the Canadian samples) were affected by the issue described above. The error involves less than 7% of the data reported in the paper. For six samples, PFAS concentrations were more than 50 times lower, while for the remaining 13 samples, the corrected concentrations were less than 20 times lower. While some of these changes are significant in absolute terms, the overall content and conclusions of the paper remain unchanged as described in more detail below.
AB - Due to a calibration problem with the targeted analysis affecting only the Canadian products (n = 17), in our original article (https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett. 1c00240), data for Canadian products were requantified using the isotopically labeled surrogate standards. Each target compound was assigned to a specific surrogate standard as described in Table S7 of the Supporting Information. As a result of the requantification of the Canadian samples, the sum of PFAS concentrations for Canadian samples has decreased, and the detection frequency of individual analytes shifted. Out of the 231 total U.S. and Canadian samples analyzed with PIGE, 29 were selected for further targeted analysis. Of those 29, 17 (only the Canadian samples) were affected by the issue described above. The error involves less than 7% of the data reported in the paper. For six samples, PFAS concentrations were more than 50 times lower, while for the remaining 13 samples, the corrected concentrations were less than 20 times lower. While some of these changes are significant in absolute terms, the overall content and conclusions of the paper remain unchanged as described in more detail below.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85120954155
U2 - 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00903
DO - 10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00903
M3 - 评论/辩论
AN - SCOPUS:85120954155
SN - 2328-8930
VL - 8
SP - 1104
EP - 1105
JO - Environmental Science and Technology Letters
JF - Environmental Science and Technology Letters
IS - 12
ER -