TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparisons of the effects of different drying methods on soil nitrogen fractions
T2 - Insights into emissions of reactive nitrogen gases (HONO and NO)
AU - WU, Dianming
AU - DENG, Lingling
AU - LIU, Yanzhuo
AU - XI, Di
AU - ZOU, Huilan
AU - WANG, Ruhai
AU - SHA, Zhimin
AU - PAN, Yuepeng
AU - HOU, Lijun
AU - LIU, Min
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020/5/3
Y1 - 2020/5/3
N2 - Reactive nitrogen (Nr) emission from soils, e.g., nitrous acid (HONO) and nitric oxide (NO), is a key process of the global nitrogen (N) cycle and has significant implications for atmospheric chemistry. To understand the underlying mechanisms of soil Nr emissions, air-dried or oven-dried soils are commonly used in the laboratory. To date, few studies have compared the effects of different drying methods on soil Nr gas fluxes and N fractions. Here, the authors studied soil water content, pH, (in)organic N content, and Nr gas fluxes of air-dried, freeze-dried, oven-dried, and fresh soils from different land-use types. The results showed that the soil pH of air-dried and oven-dried samples was significantly lower compared with fresh soil from farmland and grassland, but higher compared with forest soil. The difference in soil pH between freeze-dried and fresh soil (mean ± standard deviation: 0.52 ± 0.31) was the lowest. In general, all drying methods increased the soil NH4 +-N, NO3 −-N, and dissolved organic N contents compared with fresh soil (P < 0.05). The maximum HONO and NO flux and total emissions during a full wetting–drying cycle of fresh soil were also increased by air-drying and oven-drying (P < 0.001), but comparable with freeze-dried soil (P > 0.2). In conclusion, all drying methods should be considered for use in studies on the land–atmosphere interface and biogeochemical N cycling, whereas the freeze-drying method might be better for studies involving the measurement of soil Nr gas fluxes.
AB - Reactive nitrogen (Nr) emission from soils, e.g., nitrous acid (HONO) and nitric oxide (NO), is a key process of the global nitrogen (N) cycle and has significant implications for atmospheric chemistry. To understand the underlying mechanisms of soil Nr emissions, air-dried or oven-dried soils are commonly used in the laboratory. To date, few studies have compared the effects of different drying methods on soil Nr gas fluxes and N fractions. Here, the authors studied soil water content, pH, (in)organic N content, and Nr gas fluxes of air-dried, freeze-dried, oven-dried, and fresh soils from different land-use types. The results showed that the soil pH of air-dried and oven-dried samples was significantly lower compared with fresh soil from farmland and grassland, but higher compared with forest soil. The difference in soil pH between freeze-dried and fresh soil (mean ± standard deviation: 0.52 ± 0.31) was the lowest. In general, all drying methods increased the soil NH4 +-N, NO3 −-N, and dissolved organic N contents compared with fresh soil (P < 0.05). The maximum HONO and NO flux and total emissions during a full wetting–drying cycle of fresh soil were also increased by air-drying and oven-drying (P < 0.001), but comparable with freeze-dried soil (P > 0.2). In conclusion, all drying methods should be considered for use in studies on the land–atmosphere interface and biogeochemical N cycling, whereas the freeze-drying method might be better for studies involving the measurement of soil Nr gas fluxes.
KW - Freeze-dried
KW - NO
KW - gas flux
KW - nitrogen cycling
KW - soil pH
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85081257758
U2 - 10.1080/16742834.2020.1733388
DO - 10.1080/16742834.2020.1733388
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85081257758
SN - 1674-2834
VL - 13
SP - 224
EP - 231
JO - Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters
JF - Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters
IS - 3
ER -