Abstract
Two typical pretreatment methods including liquid-liquid extraction and static-headspace analysis had been optimized to determine cyanide in cigarette smoke by gas chromatography equipped with a micro electron capture detector. Within optimization of the extractions, both methods were compared including linearity, limit of detection, repeatability and recovery. Several commercial products were also analyzed and compared. As a conclusion, liquid-liquid extraction possessed higher sensitive while static-headspace analysis was green and broader linearity ranges. Both methods were accuracy and suitable for determine of cyanide in cigarette smoke.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3493-3498 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Asian Journal of Chemistry |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| State | Published - 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Cigarette smoke
- Cyanide
- Gas chromatography
- Liquid-liquid extraction
- Static-headspace analysis