Comparison of alternative remediation technologies for recycled gravel contaminated with heavy metals

  • Xiaofeng Gao
  • , Yilu Gu
  • , Sheng Huang
  • , Guangyin Zhen
  • , Guannan Deng
  • , Tian Xie
  • , Youcai Zhao*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

To evaluate the effects of different remediation methods on heavy metals contaminated recycled gravel, three immobilization agents (monopotassium phosphate, lime, nano-iron) and two mobilization agents (glyphosate, humic acid (HA)) were studied and compared. Results indicated that nano-iron powder was found to be more effective to immobilize Zn, Cu, Pb and Cd. Meanwhile, glyphosate presents a higher mobilization effect than HA with removal rates of about 66.7% for Cd, more than 80% for Cr, Cu and Zn, and the highest removal percentage of 85.9% for Cr. After the mobilization by glyphosate, the leaching rates of Zn, Cu and Cr were about 0.8%, and below 0.2% for Pb and Cd. The leaching rates after nano-iron powder treatment were 1.18% for Zn, 0.96% for Cr, 0.61% for Cu, 0.45% for Pb and Cd not detected. The formation and disappearance of metal (Zn/Cu/Cr/Pb/Cd) compounds were firmly confirmed through X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy analyses on crystalline phases and morphological surface structures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1005-1014
Number of pages10
JournalWaste Management and Research
Volume33
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Contaminated recycled gravel
  • construction and demolition wastes
  • glyphosate
  • heavy metals
  • immobilization
  • mobilization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of alternative remediation technologies for recycled gravel contaminated with heavy metals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this