Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Coastal protection using building with nature concept: A case study from Chongming Dongtan Shoal, China

  • Zhentao Chong
  • , Min Zhang*
  • , Jiahong Wen
  • , Luyang Wang
  • , Jie Mi
  • , Jeremy Bricker
  • , Stanley Nmor
  • , Zhijun Dai
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Shanghai Normal University
  • East China Normal University
  • Delft University of Technology
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research - NIOZ

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

With climate change and rising sea levels, the coastal zone’s flood risk is deteriorating. Previous researches have shown a gradually degrading capacity of traditional hard engineering structures (e.g., seawall, dikes) on flood mitigation due to problems such as land subsidence and insufficient maintenance. To remedy the defects, the “building with nature concept” for coastal protection with saltmarshes was examined by combining field measurements and numerical simulations. The advantages of saltmarsh over traditional seawall on flood protection was demonstrated from the perspective of both flood area mitigation and economic gain, based on scenario simulations. Results show that tidal wetlands are essential in mitigating significant wave heights (Hs) and current velocities even during storm conditions. The storm wave and current velocity reduction ratio (RRw and RRc) by saltmarshes on Chongming Dongtan Shoal (CMDS) during Typhoon 9711 is approximately 11% and 51%, respectively. The wave and current mitigation by Scirpus mariqueter are more efficient than Spartina alterniflora and Phragmites australis during measurements in 2010, which were approximately 0.3 m and 0.2 m/s, 0.125 m and 0.155 m/s, 0.086 m and 0.128 m/s per kilometer width, respectively. The summer saltmarsh area 54.2 km2 on CMDS protects approximately 32 km2 land area behind the seawall from being flooded, equivalent to the seawall heightening of approximately 0.42 m on equivalent flood mitigation. The performance of cost-and-benefit analysis shows a relatively higher (by 3%–7%) net present value (NPV) and a higher (by 1.5 times) benefit-cost ratio (BC) of nature-based solution (i.e., saltmarsh restoration) compared with traditional hard engineering solution (i.e., seawall construction). Thus, building seawall with nature, such as a hybrid flood protection measure, should be implemented in the future coastal redesign and maintenance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)152-166
Number of pages15
JournalActa Oceanologica Sinica
Volume40
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  2. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Keywords

  • Chongming Dongtan Shoal
  • cost-benefit analysis
  • nature-based flood protection
  • numerical simulation
  • storm wave mitigation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Coastal protection using building with nature concept: A case study from Chongming Dongtan Shoal, China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this