Cluster analyses of Ostracoda based on dimensions of body structures: Implications for taxonomic classification

Dayou Zhai*, Robin J. Smith, Ping Peng, Na Yu, Shunxin Ma, Xiangzhong Li, W. Baird, A. Baltanás, D. L. Danielopol, S. K. Battish, G. S. Brady, D. Robertson, G. S. Brady, A. M. Norman, N. W. Broodbakker, D. L. Danielopol, H. T. Clifford, W. Stephenson, A. C. Cohen, J. W. MartinL. S. Kornicker, P. De Deckker, K. G. McKenzie, S. Fischer, W. Hartwig, J. Higuti, K. Martens, J. Higuti, I. Schön, L. Audenaert, K. Martens, C. J. Hoskin, M. Higgie, K. R. McDonald, C. Moritz, A. Järvekülg, L. Jurine, R. L. Kaesler, J. W. Neale, I. Karanovic, I. Karanovic, I. Karanovic, I. Karanovic, W. Lee, G. N. Lance, W. T. Williams, G. N. Lance, W. T. Williams, G. N. Lance, W. T. Williams, P. Marmonier, C. Meisch, D. L. Danielopol, K. Martens, K. Martens, K. Martens, S. Savatenalinton, K. G. McKenzie, R. H. Bate, E. Robinson, L. M. Sheppard, C. Meisch, J. Schwoerbel, P. Zwick, C. Meisch, G. W. Müller, O. F. Müller, T. Namiotko, D. L. Danielopol, D. L. Danielopol, T. Rada, F. A. Ramdohr, G. O. Sars, S. Savatenalinton, E. I. Schornikov, R. J. Smith, T. Kamiya, R. J. Smith, T. Kamiya, R. J. Smith, R. Matzke-Karasz, T. Kamiya, Y. Ikeda, R. R. Sokal, C. D. Michener, N. E. Stepanaitys, T. Sywula, A. Tsukagoshi, N. Ikeya, W. Vávra, R. Victor, C. H. Fernando, Y. Yin, W. Geiger, K. Martens, D. Y. Zhai, J. L. Xiao, D. Y. Zhai, W. H. Zhao

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

We measured selected podomeres, setae and claws in different ostracods and calculated the between-specimen morphological difference, which is expressed as a Canberra dissimilarity index. Our data indicate that morphological differences between ostracods increase with their taxonomic distance. Cluster analyses of ostracod specimens based on Canberra dissimilarity are able to discriminate different species and concur with existing classifications. We suggest that the dimensions of body structures are taxonomically valuable, and that ostracod species identification can be assisted based on the dimensional data of body structures. Species discrimination with such a method does not rely on explicit morphological hiatuses, such as the presence/absence of particular setae, but instead utilizes measurable morphological differences. Our numerical methods also show good potential for studying phenotypic diversity. Analyses on ostracod populations from isolated temporary pools and those from permanent but geographically distant habitats indicate that dispersal improbability is responsible for the observed morphological differentiation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)471-502
Number of pages32
JournalCrustaceana
Volume90
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Canberra dissimilarity
  • Ostracoda
  • morphological difference
  • numerical taxonomy
  • soft parts

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cluster analyses of Ostracoda based on dimensions of body structures: Implications for taxonomic classification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this