Catch composition of monofilament gillnet netting with different mesh sizes in Qingcaosha Reservoir, Shanghai, China

  • Ya Lei Li
  • , Hao Wu
  • , Qi Gen Liu
  • , Li Qiao Chen
  • , Zhong Jun Hu*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

During 2010 to 2012, fish diversity in Qingcaosha Reservoir was studied based on gillnets (multi-mesh monofilament gillnets and single-mesh trammel gillnets), electric fishing, bottom trawl and cage. The investigation collected a total of 34 fish species, belonging to 8 orders, 12 families. Cypriniformes contained the largest number of species (19 species) in the collection, followed by Perciformes (6 species). Multi-mesh monofilament gillnets sampled 19 fish species, of which Coilia nasus was the dominant species. Hierarchical cluster analysis indicated that mesh size of monofilament gillnets had significant influence on the composition of catches: C. nasus and Hemiculter bleekeri were the dominant species of catches of gillnet netting with mesh size of 2 cm, while C. nasus was the dominant species of catches of the nettings with mesh sizes larger than 2 cm. Species numbers and the catch per unit of effort (CPUE) had a decreasing tendency with the increasing mesh size. Mesh size also had significant effects on the total length distribution of the dominant species C. nasus, which increased with the increasing mesh size. The results suggested that a combination of several gears was required to reliably estimate fish diversity of standing waters.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2518-2524
Number of pages7
JournalChinese Journal of Applied Ecology
Volume26
Issue number8
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2015

Keywords

  • Coilia nasus
  • Fish
  • Mesh size
  • Species composition
  • Total length distribution

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Catch composition of monofilament gillnet netting with different mesh sizes in Qingcaosha Reservoir, Shanghai, China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this