TY - JOUR
T1 - Bank executive incentives and liquidity creation
T2 - Evidence from China
AU - Li, Minghui
AU - Song, Yiran
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - The creation of bank liquidity is the primary function of banks. In China, because bank executives generally have both political and salary incentives, a bank's liquidity creation is susceptible to both factors. This study uses micro data on commercial banks from 2006 to 2017 to examine this topic and draws four conclusions. First, political and salary incentives are important factors influencing the liquidity creation of commercial banks in China. In particular, these incentives are stronger for bank presidents than for chairpersons. Second, under banks' executive promotion and compensation system, the political incentives for the president and chairperson in large (small and medium-sized) banks are effective (ineffective), whereas the opposite holds for the salary incentives. Third, the introduction of the “restricted salary order” in 2015 severely restricted the salary incentives of the presidents of small and medium-sized banks but not those of the chairperson. Fourth, the liquidity injected by the “Four Trillion” stimulus package changed the political incentives for the presidents and chairpersons of large banks but not those of the presidents and chairpersons of small and medium-sized banks.
AB - The creation of bank liquidity is the primary function of banks. In China, because bank executives generally have both political and salary incentives, a bank's liquidity creation is susceptible to both factors. This study uses micro data on commercial banks from 2006 to 2017 to examine this topic and draws four conclusions. First, political and salary incentives are important factors influencing the liquidity creation of commercial banks in China. In particular, these incentives are stronger for bank presidents than for chairpersons. Second, under banks' executive promotion and compensation system, the political incentives for the president and chairperson in large (small and medium-sized) banks are effective (ineffective), whereas the opposite holds for the salary incentives. Third, the introduction of the “restricted salary order” in 2015 severely restricted the salary incentives of the presidents of small and medium-sized banks but not those of the chairperson. Fourth, the liquidity injected by the “Four Trillion” stimulus package changed the political incentives for the presidents and chairpersons of large banks but not those of the presidents and chairpersons of small and medium-sized banks.
KW - Bank executives
KW - Liquidity creation
KW - Political incentives
KW - Salary incentives
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85216571647
U2 - 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.103977
DO - 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.103977
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85216571647
SN - 1057-5219
VL - 99
JO - International Review of Financial Analysis
JF - International Review of Financial Analysis
M1 - 103977
ER -