Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Anisotropic interfacial stress at solid–liquid boundaries under uniaxial strain

  • Song Tai Lv
  • , Wen Liang Lu
  • , Sheng Qian
  • , Zi Feng Yuan
  • , Zun Liang
  • , Zhi Yong Yu
  • , Yang Yang*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We present a systematic atomistic investigation of solid–liquid interfacial excess stress in a model face-centered cubic metal under uniaxial strain. Molecular dynamics simulations with embedded-atom method potentials are used to quantify the orientation-dependent interfacial stress tensor and its Cartesian components for the (100), (110), and (111) interfaces. Even without applied strain, flat solid–liquid interfaces exhibit non-zero, orientation-specific excess stress, confirming the intrinsic mechanical character of equilibrium interfaces. Under uniaxial loading, the total interfacial stress exhibits pronounced orientation-dependent anisotropy, with variations exceeding 200 mJ/m2, including sign reversals and non-monotonic trends. Decomposition into components reveals three distinct coupling modes: synchronized evolution of the in-plane excess stress components τxx and τyy for (100), a strain-dominated transverse in-plane response primarily reflected in τyy for (110), and compensating trends between τxx and τyy for (111). In contrast, the normal excess component τzz remains negligible across all cases, indicating that the mechanical response is confined to the lateral directions. These features arise despite the strain being strictly uniaxial and the liquid remaining hydrostatic, underscoring the interfacial origin of the stress anisotropy. Our results demonstrate that interfacial stress is more sensitive to orientation and strain than interfacial free energy, and must be treated as a tensorial, strain-dependent thermodynamic quantity. These findings provide quantitative benchmark data for materials-scale continuum and mesoscale modeling, including Ginzburg–Landau and phase-field crystal theories, that incorporate elastic and capillary effects. They also offer mechanistic insight for modeling microstructure evolution and interface morphology during solidification under mechanical loading.

Original languageEnglish
Article number122140
JournalActa Materialia
Volume309
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2026

Keywords

  • Atomistic simulation
  • Crystallographic anisotropy
  • Mesoscale materials modeling
  • Solid–liquid interfacial stress
  • Uniaxial strain

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anisotropic interfacial stress at solid–liquid boundaries under uniaxial strain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this