TY - JOUR
T1 - A multiscale deep learning method for quantitative visualization of traumatic hemoperitoneum at ct
T2 - Assessment of feasibility and comparison with subjective categorical estimation
AU - Dreizin, David
AU - Zhou, Yuyin
AU - Fu, Shuhao
AU - Wang, Yan
AU - Li, Guang
AU - Champ, Kathryn
AU - Siegel, Eliot
AU - Wang, Ze
AU - Chen, Tina
AU - Yuille, Alan L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© RSNA, 2020.
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of a multiscale deep learning algorithm for quantitative visualization and measurement of traumatic hemoperitoneum and to compare diagnostic performance for relevant outcomes with categorical estimation. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, single-institution study included 130 patients (mean age, 38 years; interquartile range, 25–50 years; 79 men) with traumatic hemoperitoneum who underwent CT of the abdomen and pelvis at trauma admission between January 2016 and April 2019. Labeled cases were separated into five combinations of training (80%) and test (20%) sets, and fivefold crossvalidation was performed. Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) were compared with those from a three-dimensional (3D) U-Net and a coarse-to-fine deep learning method. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) for a composite outcome, including hemostatic intervention, transfusion, and in-hospital mortality, were compared with consensus categorical assessment by two radiologists. An optimal cutoff was derived by using a radial basis function–based support vector machine. Results: Mean DSC for the multiscale algorithm was 0.61 6 0.15 (standard deviation) compared with 0.32 6 0.16 for the 3D U-Net method and 0.52 6 0.17 for the coarse-to-fine method (P,.0001). Correlation and agreement between automated and manual volumes were excellent (Pearson r = 0.97, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.93). The algorithm produced intuitive and explainable visual results. AUCs for automated volume measurement and categorical estimation were 0.86 and 0.77, respectively (P =.004). An optimal cutoff of 278.9 mL yielded accuracy of 84%, sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 93%, positive predictive value of 86%, and negative predictive value of 83%. Conclusion: A multiscale deep learning method for traumatic hemoperitoneum quantitative visualization had improved diagnostic performance for predicting hemorrhage-control interventions and mortality compared with subjective volume estimation.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of a multiscale deep learning algorithm for quantitative visualization and measurement of traumatic hemoperitoneum and to compare diagnostic performance for relevant outcomes with categorical estimation. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, single-institution study included 130 patients (mean age, 38 years; interquartile range, 25–50 years; 79 men) with traumatic hemoperitoneum who underwent CT of the abdomen and pelvis at trauma admission between January 2016 and April 2019. Labeled cases were separated into five combinations of training (80%) and test (20%) sets, and fivefold crossvalidation was performed. Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) were compared with those from a three-dimensional (3D) U-Net and a coarse-to-fine deep learning method. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) for a composite outcome, including hemostatic intervention, transfusion, and in-hospital mortality, were compared with consensus categorical assessment by two radiologists. An optimal cutoff was derived by using a radial basis function–based support vector machine. Results: Mean DSC for the multiscale algorithm was 0.61 6 0.15 (standard deviation) compared with 0.32 6 0.16 for the 3D U-Net method and 0.52 6 0.17 for the coarse-to-fine method (P,.0001). Correlation and agreement between automated and manual volumes were excellent (Pearson r = 0.97, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.93). The algorithm produced intuitive and explainable visual results. AUCs for automated volume measurement and categorical estimation were 0.86 and 0.77, respectively (P =.004). An optimal cutoff of 278.9 mL yielded accuracy of 84%, sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 93%, positive predictive value of 86%, and negative predictive value of 83%. Conclusion: A multiscale deep learning method for traumatic hemoperitoneum quantitative visualization had improved diagnostic performance for predicting hemorrhage-control interventions and mortality compared with subjective volume estimation.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85107496452
U2 - 10.1148/ryai.2020190220
DO - 10.1148/ryai.2020190220
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85107496452
SN - 2638-6100
VL - 2
SP - 1
EP - 9
JO - Radiology: Artificial Intelligence
JF - Radiology: Artificial Intelligence
IS - 6
M1 - e190220
ER -