TY - GEN
T1 - A general and efficient framework for improving Balanced Failure Biasing
AU - Mao, Shijian
AU - Zhang, Min
AU - Yan, Jia
AU - Chen, Yao
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 IEEE.
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Balanced Failure Biasing (BFB) is a way to simulate the probability of reaching a rare goal state in highly reliable Markovian systems (HRMSs). BFB gives the same probability to each ralely-arrived path of one state, therefore leading to large expenditures on paths with little influence on results. We propose a new framework using Stratified Sampling, which is a general and efficient framework for improving BFB. We introduce Stratified Sampling on BFB (SBFB), which divides the original state space into many subspaces, and rearranges the attention on each subspace. To make a further reduction on average path length, we introduce Stratified Sampling on Distance-based BFB (SBFB-D). According to experiments based on case of Workstation Cluster and case of Distributed Database System, SBFB has about 0.07% and 2.13% relative error on these two cases respectively, while SBFB-D has about 0.07% and 0.197%, comparing to standard BFB's 11.1% and 11.1%. Besides, SBFB spends about 12.30s and 28.65s on path simulation respectively, while SBFB-D spends about 13.10s and 17.40s, comparing to standard-BFB's 26.44s and 36.78s.
AB - Balanced Failure Biasing (BFB) is a way to simulate the probability of reaching a rare goal state in highly reliable Markovian systems (HRMSs). BFB gives the same probability to each ralely-arrived path of one state, therefore leading to large expenditures on paths with little influence on results. We propose a new framework using Stratified Sampling, which is a general and efficient framework for improving BFB. We introduce Stratified Sampling on BFB (SBFB), which divides the original state space into many subspaces, and rearranges the attention on each subspace. To make a further reduction on average path length, we introduce Stratified Sampling on Distance-based BFB (SBFB-D). According to experiments based on case of Workstation Cluster and case of Distributed Database System, SBFB has about 0.07% and 2.13% relative error on these two cases respectively, while SBFB-D has about 0.07% and 0.197%, comparing to standard BFB's 11.1% and 11.1%. Besides, SBFB spends about 12.30s and 28.65s on path simulation respectively, while SBFB-D spends about 13.10s and 17.40s, comparing to standard-BFB's 26.44s and 36.78s.
KW - Balanced Failure Biasing
KW - Rare-event simulation
KW - Stratified Sampling
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85099342953
U2 - 10.1109/QRS-C51114.2020.00081
DO - 10.1109/QRS-C51114.2020.00081
M3 - 会议稿件
AN - SCOPUS:85099342953
T3 - Proceedings - Companion of the 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability, and Security, QRS-C 2020
SP - 445
EP - 450
BT - Proceedings - Companion of the 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability, and Security, QRS-C 2020
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 20th IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability, and Security, QRS 2020
Y2 - 11 December 2020 through 14 December 2020
ER -