TY - JOUR
T1 - A comprehensive comparison of five different carbon-based cathode materials in CO2 electromethanogenesis
T2 - Long-term performance, cell-electrode contact behaviors and extracellular electron transfer pathways
AU - Zhen, Guangyin
AU - Zheng, Shaojuan
AU - Lu, Xueqin
AU - Zhu, Xuefeng
AU - Mei, Juan
AU - Kobayashi, Takuro
AU - Xu, Kaiqin
AU - Li, Yu You
AU - Zhao, Youcai
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - Each carbon-based material, due to the discrepancy in critical properties, has distinct capability to enrich electroactive microbes able to electrosynthesize methane from CO2. To optimize electromethanogenesis process, this study physically prepared and examined several carbon-based cathode materials: carbon stick (CS), CS twined by Ti wire (CS-Ti) or covered with carbon fiber (CS-CF), graphite felt (CS-GF) and carbon cloth (CS-CC). CS-GF electrode had constantly stable methane production (75.8 mL/L/d at −0.9 V vs. Ag/AgCl) while CS-CC showed a suppressed performance over time caused by the desposition of inorganic shell. Electrode material properties affected biofilms growth, cell-electrode contact behaviors and electron exchange. Methane formation with CS-CC biocathode was H2-concnetration dependent; CS-GF cathode possessed high antifouling properties and extensive space, enriching the microorganisms capable of catalyzing electromethanogenesis through more efficient non-H2 route. This study re-interpreted the application potentials of carbon-based materials in CO2 electroreduction and electrofuel recovery, providing valuable guidance for materials’ selection.
AB - Each carbon-based material, due to the discrepancy in critical properties, has distinct capability to enrich electroactive microbes able to electrosynthesize methane from CO2. To optimize electromethanogenesis process, this study physically prepared and examined several carbon-based cathode materials: carbon stick (CS), CS twined by Ti wire (CS-Ti) or covered with carbon fiber (CS-CF), graphite felt (CS-GF) and carbon cloth (CS-CC). CS-GF electrode had constantly stable methane production (75.8 mL/L/d at −0.9 V vs. Ag/AgCl) while CS-CC showed a suppressed performance over time caused by the desposition of inorganic shell. Electrode material properties affected biofilms growth, cell-electrode contact behaviors and electron exchange. Methane formation with CS-CC biocathode was H2-concnetration dependent; CS-GF cathode possessed high antifouling properties and extensive space, enriching the microorganisms capable of catalyzing electromethanogenesis through more efficient non-H2 route. This study re-interpreted the application potentials of carbon-based materials in CO2 electroreduction and electrofuel recovery, providing valuable guidance for materials’ selection.
KW - Carbon-based cathode
KW - Electroactive microorganisms
KW - Electromethanogenesis
KW - Electron transfer mechanism
KW - Microbial electrolysis cell (MEC)
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85049458549
U2 - 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.101
DO - 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.101
M3 - 文章
C2 - 29982061
AN - SCOPUS:85049458549
SN - 0960-8524
VL - 266
SP - 382
EP - 388
JO - Bioresource Technology
JF - Bioresource Technology
ER -