Abstract
This study compares the extent to which external technology spillovers, represented by foreign direct investment (FDI), and internal technology spillovers, represented by university-institute-industry cooperation (UIC), influence the quality of innovative outputs. Through a combination of the three-stage innovation value chain approach and econometric modelling of the knowledge production function, a panel regression is used to analyse the effects of FDI and UIC on the quality of innovative outputs during each stage, using data for 2006-2015 on 30 provinces in China. By comparing UIC with FDI, we find that UIC has a higher coefficient and stronger significance level than FDI in the knowledge innovation and product innovation stages, while institute-university linkages exhibit a negative association with the quality of innovative outputs in the technology innovation stage. However, from a regional perspective, it is found that only institute-university linkages in the knowledge innovation stage show a positive association with journal paper quality in coastal regions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 266-291 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | International Journal of Technology Management |
| Volume | 80 |
| Issue number | 3-4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- External technology spillover
- FDI
- Foreign direct investment
- Innovative output quality
- Internal technology spillover
- UIC
- University-institute-industry cooperation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative study of the effects of internal and external technology spillovers on the quality of innovative outputs in China: The perspective of multistage innovation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver