Abstract
This paper discusses the methodology of Chinese classical hermeneutics, taking one of the main Han-Song controversies, i.e. the different interpretations on Analects 12:1 between the Han school and the Song school. After comparing in detail the interpretations on keji (self-discipline) of both sides, the author holds that the interpretation of Han school is actually under-interpretation, though the Han school regards the interpretation of Song school as over-interpretation. This paper questions the traditional view, which believes the Han school is superior to the Song school on the classical interpretations.
| Original language | Chinese (Simplified) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 61-65 |
| Journal | 哲学研究 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| State | Published - 2005 |
Web of Science Index
- CSSCI
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver