罗蒂与新实用主义文学理论的可能性

Translated title of the contribution: Richard Rorty and the Possibility of a Neo-pragmatic Literary Theory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In virtue of the logic of Richard Rorty's neo-pragmatism, it is problematic to claim that Rorty's literary theory is based on his philosophy. Rather, Rorty as a neo-pragmatist and a literary theorist can both make more sense if they are put together. So we may need start from the controversy over the definition of neo-pragmatism, and activate the tension between literature and philosophy, in order to give a more thoughtful examination of Rorty's design of literary theory. Besides, we can divide theories into three types according to their function: inquiry, problematization, and therapeutics. Thus we may place better a possible neopragmatic literary theory, including how it asks, how it thinks, and how it answers.

Translated title of the contributionRichard Rorty and the Possibility of a Neo-pragmatic Literary Theory
Original languageChinese (Traditional)
Pages (from-to)165-175
Number of pages11
JournalTheoretical Studies in Literature and Art
Volume38
Issue number5
StatePublished - Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Richard Rorty and the Possibility of a Neo-pragmatic Literary Theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this