TY - JOUR
T1 - 全球科技创新中心发展态势
AU - Du, Debin
AU - Duan, Dezhong
AU - Zhang, Qiang
AU - Yu, Yingjie
AU - Guo, Weidong
AU - Jiang, Ziwei
AU - Li, Xiya
AU - Su, Han
AU - Li, Qixiang
AU - Chen, Yuling
AU - Shi, Zhihao
AU - Li, Haiqiao
AU - Yu, Siqi
AU - Ding, Junfeng
AU - Wang, Kaixin
AU - Hui, Yihan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Science Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Drawing on the essence of global science and technology innovation (STI) centers, this study evaluates the level of science and technology innovation of 140 cities worldwide by constructing a five forces assessment model of global STI centers, which includes 33 indicators in 5 dimensions. The analysis reveals a significant tripartite pattern of development in global STI centers across Europe, North America, and the Asia-Pacific region. However, divergent patterns emerge in the development of these centers across different regions. Notably, global STI centers in various regions follow distinct development trajectories. At the national level, the United States and China lead the development of global STI centers, with the former demonstrating comprehensive leadership across various dimensions. In contrast, China’s centers exhibit notable deficiencies in attracting and nurturing top-tier talent, cultivating leading subjects in science and technology, and building an innovative environment. Lastly, this study proposes targeted strategies and recommendations for establishing a globally significant talent hub, strengthening national strategic scientific and technological capabilities, and optimizing the supportive environment for scientific and technological innovation based on the shortcomings and challenges faced by China’s STI centers.
AB - Drawing on the essence of global science and technology innovation (STI) centers, this study evaluates the level of science and technology innovation of 140 cities worldwide by constructing a five forces assessment model of global STI centers, which includes 33 indicators in 5 dimensions. The analysis reveals a significant tripartite pattern of development in global STI centers across Europe, North America, and the Asia-Pacific region. However, divergent patterns emerge in the development of these centers across different regions. Notably, global STI centers in various regions follow distinct development trajectories. At the national level, the United States and China lead the development of global STI centers, with the former demonstrating comprehensive leadership across various dimensions. In contrast, China’s centers exhibit notable deficiencies in attracting and nurturing top-tier talent, cultivating leading subjects in science and technology, and building an innovative environment. Lastly, this study proposes targeted strategies and recommendations for establishing a globally significant talent hub, strengthening national strategic scientific and technological capabilities, and optimizing the supportive environment for scientific and technological innovation based on the shortcomings and challenges faced by China’s STI centers.
KW - countermeasures
KW - evaluation system
KW - global pattern
KW - global science and technology innovation centers
KW - suggestions
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85209392582
U2 - 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20240412001
DO - 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20240412001
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85209392582
SN - 1000-3045
VL - 39
SP - 1647
EP - 1659
JO - Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences
JF - Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences
IS - 9
ER -