“以言行事” 的逻辑基础及其“意向性” 疑难-从蒯因的“归谬法” 到维特根斯坦与克里普克之争

With the introduction of analytic philosophy in general and the analysis of everyday language in particular into studies of literary theory, illocution has become a widely accepted theoretical resource therein. The ready application of this theory in literary studies without considering its evolution within analytic philosophy has caused many problems in literary theory, the most visible of which is the issue of "intentionality" contained in illocution. Searle's seminal paper "The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse" marks the involvement of analytic philosophy in studies of literary theory, but his given "intentionality" stance has become a new problem. The logical status of intentionality has to be addressed in the introduction of analytic philosophy into studies of literary theory, which entails an examination of the logical basis of illocution from the point of view of analytic philosophy. The paper explores the logical basis of " illocutionary" by rethinking the " indeterminacy" of Quine and the significant dispute between Wittgenstein and Kripke in this regard, and illustrates the logical status of "intentionality" in "illocution" and the tendency of "the turn of everyday ethics" incurred by the blending ofthe speech act theory and literary theory.